compliance for 878 (87%) of a total of 1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows
extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and
provision of funding from both district councils and the regional council can be
seen as a form of “double-dipping” of rates funding from the same ratepayers.
With funding comes involvement in governance and service delivery and the
addition of regional council involvement can make these roles more complex than
they already are.
The regional council can be seen as a substitute funder for some parties that are not
prepared to be contributing their “fair share”.
17. It is clear that
for the following six months.
Working with Iwi Communications to prepare material and set timing for extensive iwi engagement.
Continuing recruiting for Engagement Officer position.
Policy and Planning Committee - Freshwater Implementation Programme Update
12
page
Project Risk/Opportunity Management
Description Effect Mitigation Strategy
Risk Rating
(unmitigated)
Actions currently being taken
Lack of a clear strategy
and timeline for
Manganui River residual flow 13
Table 3 Details of consents and special conditions in relation to abstraction rates, discharge rates and
water levels and the recording 14
Table 4 Summary of summer Manganui River daily water temperatures (°C) prior to the increase in
residual flow to 400 L/s (1992-2002) and for the years since, upstream and downstream of the
Motukawa HEP weir 16
Table 5 Summary of maximum daily water temperatures in the Manganui River, upstream and
downstream of the
rates?
Proposed rate changes
Supporting information
Auditor’s report
Have your say - Making a submission
Submission form
C O N T E N T S
CONSULTATION ISSUE 1
Freshwater
aspirations
CONSULTATION ISSUE 2
Bus services
CONSULTATION ISSUE 3
Regional
recovery
2
4
6
9
10
12
14
17
18
20
22
24
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
35
36
20
22
18
CONSULTATION ISSUE 4
Office
accommodation
24
page
inspections programmed for the 2020-2021 period, but
hydrological monitoring was undertaken by maintaining the McColl’s Bridge flow recorder.
The monitoring showed that overall the scheme operated within resource consent requirements for the vast
majority of the period being reported. During this period, the Company was fully compliant with lake levels
and the rise and recession rate restrictions for the lower Patea River. The Company provided adequate
residual flows within the Patea River at all
Operations and Regulatory Agenda Nov 2023 web
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
page
06/22 -
such as total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia and
chlorophyll-a. The spatial water quality attribute models were variable in performance however, with the
exception of the ammonia criteria, those utilised for this assessment were rated to have satisfactory to very
good performance (Snelder et al. 2022). Caution is advised when interpreting absolute values estimated for
specific locations with spatial water quality models, due to the associated uncertainty. Models such as these