Overall, both surveys indicated that the discharge of treated stormwater and leachate discharges from the
Colson Road landfill site had not had any significant detrimental effect on the macroinvertebrate
communities of the Puremu and Manganaha Streams, or the unnamed tributary of the Puremu Stream.
Air quality monitoring showed that off-site there were no significant adverse effects in relation to
suspended particulates, dust deposition rates or odour beyond the site boundary.
An enclosed …
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the STDC’s approach
report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans
of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of
the region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance
during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with
of environmental performance 1.1.5
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by SDC during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to their
environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holders
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to demonstrating
consent compliance in site
excelsa), Miro (Prumnopitys ferruginea) and
Matai (Prumnopitys taxifolia) and is generally in good condition. The
understorey and ground cover is in good condition and is made up of a wide
number of shrub species including Kawakawa (Piper excelsum), Kanono
(Coprosma grandifolia), and Coprosma areolata along with a wide range of
ferns. Also of note is a small area containing Swamp maire (Syzygium
maire) and the fern Deparia petersenii subsp. congrua (both rated
Regionally Distinctive).
be abstracted for
washing at quarries fit within the permitted activity rule [Rule 15] of the Regional
Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki. That is, the abstraction volume shall not exceed 50 cubic
metres per day, and the abstraction rate shall not exceed 1.5 litres per second.
1.4.2 Water discharge permit
Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant
into water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in
a
(RFWP) for Taranaki.
Graham Harris (2000) Limited holds no water abstraction permit. The water volume
and abstraction rate required to service the Company’s operations are less than 50
cubic metres per day and 1.5 litres per second respectively, therefore the activity is
permitted under Rule 15 of the RFWP.
Water discharge permit 1.4.2
Section 15(1)(a) of the Resource Management Act stipulates that no person may
discharge any contaminant into water, unless the activity is