alleged to be associated with a particular site. If there is
potentially an issue of legal liability, the Council must be able to prove by
investigation that the identified company is indeed the source of the incident (or that
the allegation cannot be proven).
1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder(s) during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the STDC’s approach
statistically significant, and that has a relative magnitude > 1 percent change per year),
it has not been adopted in this report. While this method is useful and indicative when used to analyze a
short, or initial, time period, it becomes less useful as the time series being studied grows longer. In fact, the
rate of change which may be considered meaningful is specific to each unique site. As a consequence, while
absolute and relative rates of change are calculated in this report, the interpretation
Overall, both surveys indicated that the discharge of treated stormwater and leachate discharges from the
Colson Road landfill site had not had any significant detrimental effect on the macroinvertebrate
communities of the Puremu and Manganaha Streams, or the unnamed tributary of the Puremu Stream.
Air quality monitoring showed that off-site there were no significant adverse effects in relation to
suspended particulates, dust deposition rates or odour beyond the site boundary.
An enclosed …
to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s
environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and
report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans
of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of
the region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance
during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with
of environmental performance 1.1.5
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by SDC during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to their
environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holders
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to demonstrating
consent compliance in site