page 77 6.3 Appendix III: Examples of Taranaki Coastal Reso urces, Aerial Plans, 1987 Note: These maps have been scanned for future digitalising of the lines and erosion rate information at a high resolution. Attached are examples only. 1. Tongaporutu (#650476) 2. Whitecliffs North (#650481) 3. Mimi (#650468) 4. Urenui (#658737) (not included here) 5. Onaero (#650473) (not included here) 6. Waitara East (#658739) (not included here) 7. Waitara
resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. page 3 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. …
(KiwiRAP). KiwiRAP provides a consistent assessment of the infrastructure safety level of New Zealand roads. SH3 between New Plymouth and Waitara has a KiwiRAP rating of 2-stars. This indicates the road has limited infrastructure safety including low shoulder width, and fails to achieve the level of service required for a Regional road. This is likely to pose further safety risk for cyclists and walkers. Figure 6 displays regional KiwiRAP ratings for comparison. Figure 6: KiwiRAP
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement
rates are fair and equitable and that you the ratepayer are getting the best value for your rates. I support transparent sustainable commercial developments that provide strong balanced economy that benefits all not just a few. While improving the region's air, land, and water quality for an overall healthy environment in which we live work and play, now and for our future generations. Kane for a fresh clean environment in which to live, work and play. I now respectfully ask for your vote of support
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management
achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
habitat loss or the impact of invasive plants and animals. Habitat loss (through land clearance and drainage) has historically been the main pressure on biodiversity. While the rate of land clearance and drainage has declined in recent times, the ongoing loss and modification of remnant habitats remains an issue, particularly on privately owned land in Taranaki. Even small losses of habitat can now have a disproportionate impact on remaining biodiversity – not only in terms of
locality) Beach Road – Opunake Beach _________________________________________________________________________________ 1.3 Map Co-ordinates at point of works (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR 1673748 E -5632044 N (NZTM) 1.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)