page 62 Appendices Appendix 1: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $95/hr $90/hr Professional/supervisory staff $120/hr $112/hr Managers $174/hr $163/hr Support staff $95/hr $90/hr
… by Friday 24th February Kavanagh Farm Dairy numbers 40393/ 40394, Nowell Rd, Hawera 21st March 10:00-1:30pm Focus: Net Zero emissions NCEA Links: L1 90160, L2 91298, L3 91532 Registrations due by Friday 10th March Term 2 field trips Gibson Farm Dairy No. 40374, Whareora Road. Hawera 9th May 10:00 -1:30pm Focus: Lowering environmental impacts- reducing stocking rates and imported feed to reduce emissions – lowering methane output and Nitrogen surplus. Also examining use of
by Friday 24th February Kavanagh Farm Dairy numbers 40393/ 40394, Nowell Rd, Hawera 21st March 10:00-1:30pm Focus: Net Zero emissions NCEA Links: L1 90160, L2 91298, L3 91532 Registrations due by Friday 10th March Term 2 field trips Gibson Farm Dairy No. 40374, Whareora Road. Hawera 9th May 10:00 -1:30pm Focus: Lowering environmental impacts- reducing stocking rates and imported feed to reduce emissions – lowering methane output and Nitrogen surplus. Also examining use of
problem • We have used t-tests to determine whether two percentages are different from each other. With each t-test that is done, we incur a probability of a Type I error (rejection of a true null hypothesis or in other words ‘false positive’). The probability of committing a Type I error is the significance level of the test, which is set to 5%. When doing multiple tests, the Type I error rate is inflated. We have used the false discovery rate (FDR) method to control the expected proportion
Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting September 2017.
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for
Services, spoke to the memorandum to receive, consider and adopt the Council’s 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal, the consultation document for the 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal, for public consultation, and the 2017/2018 estimates. 6.2 The key points in the 2017/2018 Annual Plan – Statement of Proposal were highlighted to the Council, being: A 1% general rates increase against a proposed increase of 0.5% for 2017/2018 in the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan
consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such
both environmental and administrative performance and compliance with resource consents 6135-1 and 5325-1, and a good level of administrative compliance for consent 5935-1. There was one incident recorded by the Council in relation to the Company’s landfarming operations at the Spence Road site under consent 5935-1. This incident was operational rather than environmental in nature, and has been dealt with effectively by the Company, but affects their overall compliance rating for that
isolation valves have been installed on the disposal lines for use should it be necessary to remove the disposal line valves for maintenance. An accessible sampling site has been constructed at the end of the disposal trenches. STDC reported that a sludge survey of the oxidation pond (in January 2006) indicated that at the current rate of accumulation, sludge removal would not be required for another 11 years. An updated Management Plan (July 2007) was supplied by the consent holder for the