holder, in conjunction with the Council,
undertake ecological monitoring associated with the abstraction.
Condition 2 stipulates that the consent holder records the daily rates of abstraction
and make these records available to the Council.
Condition 3 deals with review procedures.
Fonterra also holds water permit 0920 to take up to 700 cubic metres/day of water
from a bore in the Kaupokonui Catchment for factory cooling water using plate heat
exchangers. This permit was issued by the
Dispersant is applied at the rates and by the methods
recommended by the manufacturer.
Permitted
Discharge of human
sewage into water or onto
land in the coastal marine
area
D2.3 • Discharge does not pass through soil or wetland;
• Excludes discharges from ships and offshore installations.
Prohibited 1.1(c), 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5.4, 5.5, 8.1,
9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.7, 13.1,
14.1, 14.2, 14.3
Other discharges of water
or contaminants into water or
onto land in the
population of the South Taranaki district being Maori.
2013 Census figures show that the unemployment rate across the region is 5.6% with only
small variations from one district to another. The rate of unemployment is below that for
New Zealand which sits at 7.1%. Rates of unemployment among Maori are higher.
Households without access to a motor vehicle is highest in New Plymouth district (7.2% of
households) and lowest in Stratford district (6.6% of households). Households without
access to a
a. The consent holder shall pay to the Taranaki Regional Council all the administration,
monitoring and supervision costs of this consent, fixed in accordance with section 36
of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Special conditions
1. The rate of discharge shall not exceed 3,900 litres per second.
2. The consent holder shall install and maintain signage, or other suitable facilities at the
site of discharge, for public safety purposes, warning the public that there may be a
and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to the company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
detrimental effects were found at the time of the November survey. At the time of the March
survey the results suggested poor preceding water quality that may be indicative of adverse effects
associated with the landfill leachate.
Air quality monitoring showed that there were no significant adverse effects in relation to suspended
particulates, dust deposition rates or odour beyond the site boundary.
An enclosed gas flare system was installed for air quality control during the 2017-2018
to 21% (for nitrate nitrogen) would be captured.
Even if the total loadings from only pastoral catchments were considered, the overall capture
rate rose only to 23%: that is, over three-quarters of all contaminants originating from
pastoral land would still enter waterways if the LAWF recommendations were fully
implemented.
When Prof McDowell ran the model for the Taranaki ring plain, he found there would be
substantial differences in residual contaminant load entering waterways,
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and