Your search for 'bores' returned 759 results.

KA 1/7/19/20 hydraulic fracturing monitoring report 2016-2018

during the period being reported is provided below in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of hydraulic fracturing details Well Bore id. Fracturing date Injection zone (m TVss) Formation Start End KA20 GND2594 29/11/16 13/12/16 3,211 to 3,433 Kapuni Group 1 http://geology.com/energy/hydraulic-fracturing-fluids/ 2 http://frackwire.com/nitrogen-gas-fracking page 5 Figure 1 Location map page 6

Report 2011-2013 (groundwater monitoring)

comprises alternating Tertiary sandstone, conglomeratic shell and mudstone beds. The formation extends across almost the entire region, except north of Urenui (Taylor & Evans, 1999). In a hydrocarbon exploration bore near Stratford the formation was encountered from 170 to 1,086 m 2 mTVDSS: the true vertical depth sub sea level page 6 below ground level. It is exposed throughout large areas of the eastern hill

Fact sheet 2: Arsenic

generally retain their body fat. Sources of stock drinking water should be tested for organochlorine pesticides if they are drawn from surface water downstream of a sheep dip or from a bore located within 300 metres of a sheep dip. Stock should not be allowed to drink from surface water downstream from or within drainage areas Disclaimer The recommendations, views and opinions expressed represent those of the University of Canterbury. The University disclaims any legal liability arising out

Stratford district landfills monitoring 2018-2019

the process of being replaced by the new leaseholder. The site was unoccupied at the time of the inspection and no odour or dust issues were noted. 2.2.2 Results of groundwater monitoring Groundwater samples were taken from monitoring bores up slope (GND1015 and GND1016) and down slope (GND1014) of the landfill on two occasions. The results from these samples are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. Table 2 Results of the Stratford landfill groundwater quality survey, 31 August 2018

Annual report 2013-2014

information that details both the design and construction specifications of the injection well(s) and illustrates well integrity and the isolation of the well bore from surrounding formations. In Taranaki, contaminants disposed of by DWI are generally limited to produced water, saline groundwater, contaminated stormwater, waste drilling fluids, hydraulic fracturing (HF) fluids, and production sludges. The Council has approved, on specific occasions, the discharge of small volumes of other

Applications received 5 December to 11 December 2022

To discharge farm dairy effluent onto land Discharge Permit 771 Eltham Road, Mangatoki Inaha 22-11077-1.0 R2/11077-1.0 Catalina Trusts 1 & 2 Trading as Catalina Farms 7-Dec-22 New consent To use land for holding cattle in a stockholding area Land Use Consent 178 Airport Drive, New Plymouth Waiongana 22-06372-2.0 R2/6372-2.0 Taranaki By-Products Limited 8-Dec-22 Replacement for expiring consent To take and use groundwater from a bore for stock water and dairy purposes Water Permit 637 Ahipaipa

Report 2013-2014

monitoring period 23 Table 2 Sample obtained on 28 January 2014 from an unnamed tributary of the Waiau Stream post initial hydraulic fracturing activities 24 Table 3 Kowhai-C wellsite associated groundwater monitoring bore details 25 Table 4 Pre and post hydraulic fracturing results obtained from groundwater monitoring bore GND2432 27 Table 5 Pre and post hydraulic fracturing results obtained from groundwater monitoring bore GND2433 28 Table 6 Pre and post hydraulic fracturing

Annual report 2014-2015

undertaken by the Council at the Wellington landfarm during the 2014-2015 monitoring year 16 Figure 4 Surface and Groundwater sampling locations 17 Figure 5 Total dissolved salt (TDS) concentration in g/m3 for monitoring bores GND 2284 and GND2285 20 Figure 6 Benzene concentrations across the Wellington Landfarm Groundwater Monitoring network 21 Figure 7 Marine Ecological Sample Sites 25 List of photos Photo 1 An example of a landfarmed area, Wellington landfarm 2013