Comparison to WHO guidelines 5
3.3 Temporal Patterns 7
4 Trend Analysis 8
5 Discussion 10
6 Future Monitoring at Central School 11
7 Recommendations 12
Bibliography and references 13
List of tables
Table 1 WHO guidelines for PM2.5 monitoring 1
Table 2 PM2.5 air quality summary statistics, based on daily means 5
Table 3 Number of days falling into environmental performance indicator category each year of
monitoring 6
List of figures
Figure 1 Overview of the
Brixton
22 June 2016
A site visit was made to conduct a compliance monitoring inspection.
Waitara Road
All of the worm beds were covered at the time of the inspection and the areas between
the worm beds had good grass growth that had been recently mowed. There were
some areas of ponding as a result of the very heavy rains over the weekend. There was
page
20
some residual (trickle flow) stormwater discharging into the grate in front of the main
shed. The site manager
Kohiti Road from
which wastewater is transferred to the treatment system for the nearby rendering
operations. Consent 3117 now applies to a small shed used for sick cows on
Katotauru Road.
page
7
1.4.1 Water abstraction permit
Section 14 of the Resource Management Act stipulates that no person may take, use,
dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource
consent or rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some
Ordinary Council Agenda August 2025
Executive Audit and Risk agenda December 2023 web
Consents & Regulatory agenda July 2021
Water abstraction permits
Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is
expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular
categories set out in Section 14. Permits authorising the abstraction of water are issued by the Council
under Section 87(d) of the RMA.
Water discharge permits
Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant
locations
page
14
Figure 4 RNZ Uruti soil sampling locations (irrigation areas) and groundwater monitoring wells
page
15
2. Results
2.1. Inspections
RNZ Uruti facility Mokau Road
03 August 2016
During the inspection the following was observed. A full surface water sample run of the Haehanga Stream
was undertaken and groundwater samples were collected from the groundwater monitoring wells. Heavy
rain persisted throughout the inspection.
tributary monitoring site (KOI000130). The stream was running at a moderate steady
flow, was relatively clear and light green in colour. The upstream pond area was at a low level (below the
weir inlets) even though heavy rain had occurred prior to the inspection and sampling survey.
page
10
It was found that the sawdust site area has not been capped. It was observed that the northern section had
been temporary fenced off and covered with a light layer of soil that was showing
Mangawhio and Rotokare fell within band C for
both NOF attributes.
Lake Kaikura had a LakeSPI Index of 66%, falling into the ‘High’ category for lake ecological condition.
This result reflected the dominance of native submerged plants but of relatively limited biodiversity, and
minimal impact by non-native weeds. Lake Kaikura ranked 70th nationally for ecological condition (for
257 rank positions over 323 surveyed lakes). Under the NPS-FM, a Native Condition Index of 52% and