resource consents, which are appended to this report. page 11 2.2. Results 2.2.1. Site inspections 13 October 2016 The site was inspected in fine weather with light easterly wind conditions. The cap was well grassed with no ponding, cracking or exposed refuse noted. Heavy rain the previous day had left the cap damp underfoot. It was observed that the remediated crack area was re-grassing well and was nearly indistinguishable from the surrounding area. The batters
OMV New Zealand Ltd Maui Production Station Annual Report 2022-2023
a large pond. The outlet from the pond is an inverted pipe located at the opposite end of the pond from the inlet. The discharge from the pond emerges from a pipe to fall over a small waterfall. At the base of the waterfall the discharged water runs down a natural cobbled channel beneath native riparian vegetation for approximately 10 metres before entering the Patea River, downstream of the intake weir. 1.2.2 Midhirst water supply The Midhirst community WTP was originally supplied the
Puketapu for a land-based disposal (as w ell as suggesting that airport land be used for that purpose). We w ere told that such use aligns w ith the fact that portions of the land are already used for the disposal of solid w aste from the NP WWTP. Such an offer is generous, but Mr Kitto advised us that at most there w as 311 hectares of land available at Puketapu and it was some 7 km distant from the New Plymouth WWTP. The land in question falls far short of the requirements identif ied by Mr Manning.
high water springs, the application falls under Rule C1.8 “Erection or placement of a large structure or structures, and related occupation of the coastal marine area” and is classified as a discretionary and restricted coastal activity. As such, the Minister of Conservation is the consent authority for this application. 3. The application was received on 26 October 2006, accompanied by an assessment of environmental effects [AEE] prepared by the applicant’s consultant, MWH NZ Ltd
allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. Permits authorising the abstraction of water are issued by the Council under Section 87(d) of the RMA. Water discharge permits Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant into water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or by national regulations. Permits
2019-13. page Appendix I Resource consents held by Westown Haulage Ltd (For a copy of the signed resource consent please contact the TRC Consents department) page Water abstraction permits Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular …
Contact Energy Stratford Power Station Annual Report 2023-2024
Consents department) page Water abstraction permits Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. Permits authorising the abstraction of water are issued by the Council under Section 87(d) of the RMA. Water discharge permits Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA
consents held by Oaonui Water Supply Ltd (For a copy of the signed resource consent please contact the TRC Consents department) page Water abstraction permits Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. Permits authorising the abstraction of water are