revenue streams. Port Taranaki Ltd operates in a highly-
competitive trading environment and there are no guarantees that it will be able to continue to deliver forecast
dividend levels. Accordingly there is a risk that profits and dividends may fall at some future point. This is the
biggest risk to the delivery of the Council’s proposed programmes.
Over the ten years, there are fluctuations in the level of changes in general rates. Unchanged, these fluctuations
would result in
discharge points to the stream were observed, with no effects evident in the stream as a result of
stormwater discharging offsite.
A new flare stack had been installed to flare natural gas venting from the hydrocarbon storage tanks. The
separation equipment was all functional and operating as required. The pilot flares were clean burning with
no sign of smoke.
22 November 2018
Heavy rain had fallen the day prior to the inspection. No hydrocarbon sheens were noted in puddles or
within
response.
Contact: Marcia Reynolds Steve Brown
Phone: 06-757 3900 06-757 3900
0272419444
page
Document #: 1024851
Taranaki Trained Responders as at 14 Oct 2020 (up-to-date list in WEBEOC)
Responder Name Responder Employee Response Level Support
Staff
Specialist
Role
Du Fall First Gas Regional
Alan Coldrick Port Taranaki Regional
Albert Plant Port Taranaki Regional
Bart Jansma Riverwise Consulting Regional
Brian
Policy and Planning Committee Agenda August 2023
Operations and Regulatory Committee Agenda 11 June 2024
below. Records of production and incinerator
operation were inspected and found to be satisfactory.
1 September 2015
The inspection was conducted during light showers, with 47.5 mm of rain recorded
over the previous few days at the New Plymouth Wastewater Treatment Plant
(NPWWTP). Some pollen was present on the surface of SV8000, otherwise the ponds
were relatively clear.
The incinerator was in the process of starting up after a blocked liquids nozzle had
been cleaned. Recent
effective under the new operation. In terms
of equipment that AFT have to mitigate effects of odour and dust, these are all based on
having birds contained within a negative pressure maintained enclosed space.
22. Likewise the TRC in its assessment of the Application appears to make a similar error of
omission to conclude that the consent application falls under Rule 52 of the RAQP. Rule 52
covers “Existing poultry farming processes” whereas AFT (and Tonkin and Taylor) clearly
4.5.1 Asset maintenance expenditure requirements
All expenditure on infrastructure assets will fall into one of two categories: capital
expenditure or operating expenditure.
(a) Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure projects are those displaying one or more of the following
characteristics:
page
Okato Scheme Asset Management Plan
27 August 2020 23
Construction works which create a new asset that did not previously exist in any shape
or form.
Expenditure
4.5.1 Asset maintenance expenditure requirements
All expenditure on infrastructure assets will fall into one of two categories: capital
expenditure or operating expenditure.
(a) Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure projects are those displaying one or more of the following
characteristics:
page
Okato Scheme Asset Management Plan
27 August 2020 23
Construction works which create a new asset that did not previously exist in any shape
or form.
Expenditure