activity
and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the
matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the companies activities during the period under review,
including scientific and technical data.
Subsection 3 discusses the results, their interpretation, and their significance for the environment in the
immediate vicinity of the site under discussion.
for the period under review.
Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 7).
In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of the industrial activity
and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the location of the activity, and an outline of the
matters covered by the company’s air discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the company’s activities during the period
of the monitoring programme in place for the period under review.
Each company’s activity is then discussed in a separate section (Sections 2 to 6).
In the subsections for each company (e.g. Section 2.1) there is a general description of
the industrial activity and its discharges, an aerial photograph or map showing the
location of the activity, and an outline of the matters covered by the company’s air
discharge permit.
Subsection 2 presents the results of monitoring of the
water monitoring. The removal of hydrocarbon related products reduces
risk in these areas significantly. The odour issue is well understood and with correct
operational techniques applied can be well controlled.
_________________
David Gibson
9 March 2021
page
Appendix 1-One Billion Tree Programme-Funding Agreement Map
BEFORE THE TARANAKI REGIONAL COUNCIL
STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DAVID PAUL GIBSON
DATED 9 March 2021
(Pukengahu closed landfill) 22
Table 10 Evaluation of environmental performance over time-Pukengahu landfill 22
page
iii
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing SDC landfill sites 4
Figure 2 Stratford landfill (shaded in yellow) and sampling locations 6
Figure 3 Graph showing chloride levels in the groundwater at the Stratford landfill 9
Figure 4 Graph showing ammoniacal nitrogen levels in the groundwater at the Stratford landfill 9
Figure 5 …
hydraulic fracturing return fluid sampling 16
Table 8 Results of hydraulic fracturing return fluid sampling 18
Table 9 Summary of performance for consent 10025-2.1 21
List of figures
Figure 1 Location map 5
page
1
1 Introduction
1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource
Management Act 1991
1.1.1 Introduction
This report outlines and discusses the results of the monitoring programme implemented by the Taranaki
Regional …
industry, and where composting and “a worm driven waste management industry” are seen as viable
alternatives to land fill.
2.2 Location
The site where the activities take place is located on State Highway 3 (1460 Mokau Road) approximately 2
kilometres south of the Uruti Village and lies within the catchment of the Haehanga Stream, which is a
tributary of the Mimitangiatua River. The legal Description is Pt Sec 4 Blk 11 Upper Waitara SD. A copy of the
title and a map of the property are …
to date 65
Table 20 Summary of performance for TPJ Partnership’s culvert installation consent 10209-1.1 66
Table 21 Summary of performance for Taranaki Trucking Company Ltd's cleanfill consent 5561-1 71
page
vii
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing the locations of the cleanfills monitored under this programme during
the year under review 5
Figure 2 AA Contracting Ltd cleanfill and sampling sites at Henwood Road, New Plymouth 11
Figure 3 A & A
Wai-iti Beach Retreat monitoring report 2018-2019
Daily, average concentrations of fats in wastewater discharge, based on 24 hour flow-
proportioned composite samples 33
Figure 8 Daily, average COD in wastewater discharge, based on 24 hour flow-proportioned composite
samples 33
Figure 9 Map of sampling sites in relation to the outfall 37
Figure 10 Mean number of species per quadrat for spring surveys (1992-2017) 38
Figure 11 Mean Shannon-Weiner indices per quadrat for spring surveys (1992-2017) 38
Figure 12 Mean number of