and generator starts. This operation is programmed to run in an
automated manner. This can be overridden by manual controls but generally it will follow this
predetermined operation.
The following considerations must be taken into account when determining the optimum operation of
the power scheme. References to scheme components can be found in the map and diagram in
Appendix 1.
1. Head Works - Operations that occur:
a) Sluice the intake bywash and screens Gate1.
b) Sluice the
officers’ report, there
is no specific rule in the plan for composting operations. The application was
therefore assessed under rule 55 as a discretionary activity.
3. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
3.1 A brief description of the terrain of the site is presented in the June 2019
AECOM odour assessment. This notes that operations are carried out on the
river flats in the valley, which is surrounded by steep-sided hills. The site
page
3
location map in Figure 1
Page 13 of 41
Environmental Monitoring
and Reporting (EMAR)
continued
place for authoritative, up-to-date environmental data and information.
Data and information from LAWA are being used by many (central and local government, research
and education sector, industry, iwi and public) in a wide range of applications to inform decision
making.
3. New Projects.
The LAWA Operating System Upgrade was completed. This critical piece of work was required to
continue to be able to maintain and
Table 9 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 23
List of figures
Figure 1 WRS Symes Manawapou Landfarm extent and regional location 6
Figure 2 WRS Symes Manawapou Landfarm monitoring well locations 11
Figure 3 Consent holder provided landfarm application map area 15
Figure 4 Soil transect locations M1810 WRS Symes Manawapou Landfarm 2019-2020 monitoring 15
Figure 5 Lake Taumaha surface water sample location 17
List of photos
Photo 1 WRS Symes Manawapou …
performance for consent 6621-1 58
List of figures
Figure 1 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Kaponga WWTP 11
Figure 2 Biomonitoring sites in the Kaupokonui River in relation to the Kaponga WWTP discharge with
taxa number, MCI scores and SQMCI scores for each site 15
Figure 3 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Manaia WWTP 21
Figure 4 Map showing sampling sites in relation to Patea WWTP 36
Figure 5 E. coli numbers for lower Patea River at the
New Zealand Energy Corporation DWI Annual Report 2022-2023
Operations and Regulatory Committee Agenda February 23 Part 2
39%
Cultural/historical 48 70%
Ecological/scientific 41 59%
page
9
3.2 Land tenure
The foreshore and seabed is deemed to be owned by the Crown, except where there
is a surveyed title (around New Zealand, it is estimated that less than 1% of the New
Zealand foreshore is privately owned1). However, Crown ownership of the foreshore
and seabed has been disputed
in some quarters and in June
2003 the Court of Appeal
ruled that South Island Iwi
could take a claim for the
data for South Taranaki well sites
(Figure 11) supplied by Origin Energy NZ Ltd who purchased Swift in
2008 17
Table 4 TAG Oil Ltd supplied hydraulic fracturing data for Central Taranaki well
sites (Figure 11) 17
Table 4(a) Austral Pacific fracturing data for the Cardiff Central Taranaki well site
(Figure 11) 18
Table 5 Greymouth Petroleum and subsidiary company supplied fracturing data
for Central and North Taranaki well sites (Figure 11) 18
List of figures
Figure 1 Map
Resource Management
page
Consent 10884-1.0
Page 5 of 5
Map showing cleanfill location
Map showing extent of cleanfill discharge (approximate)
page
page
Appendix II
Categories used to evaluate environmental and
administrative performance
page
Categories used to evaluate environmental and administrative
performance
Environmental performance is