for a type 2 spill tOC_2 4 _Toc266280510 5.5 Procedures for a type 3 spill tOC_2 5 _Toc266280511 5.6 Debriefing tOC_1 5 _Toc266280512 6. Points to consider tOC_1 5 _Toc266280513 7. Document review tOC_1 6 _Toc266280514 Appendix I Map of site tOC_1 7 _Toc266280515 Appendix II List of equipment tOC_1 8 _Toc266280516 Appendix III Taranaki Regional Council spill trailer tOC_1 9 _Toc266280517 Appendix IV List of
Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. Iwi considerations 15. This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as outlined in the adopted long- term plan and/or annual plan. Community considerations 16. This memorandum and the associated recommendations
debris deposits is prevalent, which will be forming most of the suspended sediment load. Detailed regional soil maps do not yet exist for the Taranaki area, however the soil orders have been mapped. Most of the catchments are identified as Allophanic Soils which have a low erosion rate unless exposed or on steep slopes. The Allophanic soils mostly comprise fines and in exposed banks will likely erode into waterways as sands, silts and clays. page 7 Tonkin & Taylor
figures Figure 1 Regional map showing the locations of the cleanfills monitored under this programme during the year under review 4 Figure 2 AA Contracting Ltd cleanfill and sampling sites at Henwood Road, New Plymouth 9 Figure 3 A & A George Family Trust consented cleanfill area at Dudley Road, Inglewood from 19 June 2019 14 Figure 4 BJ & LB Bishop's cleanfill and sampling sites at Ahu Ahu Road, Oakura 18 Figure 5 Downer EDI Works Ltd cleanfill, Dorset Road, New Plymouth 24
Table 9 Summary of Company performance in respect of Consent 7884-1.1 2016-2017 22 Table 10 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 24 List of figures Figure 1 Wellington Landfarm with associated monitoring locations 7 Figure 2 Company provided landfarm application area map Wellington Landfarm 14 Figure 3 Long terms TDS concentrations GND2284, 2285 and drainage pipe GND2364 19 List of photos Photo 1 An example of a landfarmed area Wellington landfarm 2013 6
NPDC New Plymouth wastewater treatment plant resource consent monitoring report 2019-2020
marine features and benthic sampling locations have been shown in Figure 1. To better achieve this part of Objective A, a more comprehensive habitat mapping investigation is suggested. page 2 This document may only be reproduced with permission from Cawthron Institute. Part reproduction or alteration of the document is prohibited. 1. OUTSTANDING SUBSTRATES / BENTHIC HABITATS The Taranaki Regional Council has already defined a list of 66 sites as ‘sensitive’
responses 1 Clause 6 – Floodways Amend Decline The submitter opposes clause 6.1. The submitter has a number of services located over and under floodways, which do not affect the ability of the floodway to function. In some situations, services are placed on road bridges (e.g. the North Street Bridge crossing the Waitara River - Map 2c) which would require an authority under clause 6.1(d). The submitter seeks the following amendment: 6.1 No person, except Network Utility
C D Boyd Drilling Waste Land Farming Annual Report 2022-2023
performance for consent 6621-1 58 List of figures Figure 1 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Kaponga WWTP 11 Figure 2 Biomonitoring sites in the Kaupokonui River in relation to the Kaponga WWTP discharge with taxa number, MCI scores and SQMCI scores for each site 15 Figure 3 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Manaia WWTP 21 Figure 4 Map showing sampling sites in relation to Patea WWTP 36 Figure 5 E. coli numbers for lower Patea River at the