Your search for 'iwi map' returned 2177 results.

Application Appendix E Sediment Assessment 20 02053 4 0 + 5 other renewals Trustpower 25 Nov 2020

debris deposits is prevalent, which will be forming most of the suspended sediment load. Detailed regional soil maps do not yet exist for the Taranaki area, however the soil orders have been mapped. Most of the catchments are identified as Allophanic Soils which have a low erosion rate unless exposed or on steep slopes. The Allophanic soils mostly comprise fines and in exposed banks will likely erode into waterways as sands, silts and clays. page 7 Tonkin & Taylor

Regional Software Holdings Ltd Annual Report 2022-23

refunded to councils or allocated to FY24 programmes at the discretion of the RCEOs Group. Notably 59% of the revenue collected for the SFMS in FY23 came from central government. This funding was provided in support of work in the Essential Freshwater Programme, EMAR, LiDAR, iwi capability building and spatial projects. This investment from central government is an endorsement of the work of Te Uru Kahika, as well as the operating model that RSHL provides. Te Uru Kahika is a local government

CPSchedule8B

page 242 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I S chedu le 7 – S ign i f i c an t s u r f b re aks Schedule 7B – Significant Surfing Area The Significant Surfing Area extends from Cape Road in the south to Kaihihi road in the north, Map Link Maps 16, 17, 18, 19. annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=19

Schedule 7B - Significant Surfing Area

page 197 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I S chedu le 7 – S ign i f i c an t s u r f b re aks Schedule 7B – Significant Surfing Area The Significant Surfing Area extends from Cape Road in the south to Kaihihi road in the north, Map Link Maps 16, 17, 18, 19. annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=14083dae18734b83a3a7a0fc51b34283&MapExtentID=17

Annual report 2013-2014

BTW supplied final site map showing spreading areas 1-8 and pits A and B which have since been decommissioned 13 Figure 3 Council soil sampling transect locations, areas F1 to F8 14 Figure 4 Groundwater and surface water sampling sites, Oeo landfarm 15 List of photos Photo 1 Oeo Landfarm, western side prior to landfarming operations 6 Photo 2 Spreading area F1 during 14 February sampling inspection showing good pasture establishment 12 Photo 3 Sampling liquid portion

STDC Kaponga, Manaia, Patea and Waverley WWTPs Monitoring Programme 2021-2022

performance for consent 6621-1 58 List of figures Figure 1 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Kaponga WWTP 11 Figure 2 Biomonitoring sites in the Kaupokonui River in relation to the Kaponga WWTP discharge with taxa number, MCI scores and SQMCI scores for each site 15 Figure 3 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Manaia WWTP 21 Figure 4 Map showing sampling sites in relation to Patea WWTP 36 Figure 5 E. coli numbers for lower Patea River at the

Guidelines for a contingency plan for spillage response

for a type 2 spill tOC_2 4 _Toc266280510 5.5 Procedures for a type 3 spill tOC_2 5 _Toc266280511 5.6 Debriefing tOC_1 5 _Toc266280512 6. Points to consider tOC_1 5 _Toc266280513 7. Document review tOC_1 6 _Toc266280514 Appendix I Map of site tOC_1 7 _Toc266280515 Appendix II List of equipment tOC_1 8 _Toc266280516 Appendix III Taranaki Regional Council spill trailer tOC_1 9 _Toc266280517 Appendix IV List of

Annual report 2016-2017

Table 9 Summary of Company performance in respect of Consent 7884-1.1 2016-2017 22 Table 10 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 24 List of figures Figure 1 Wellington Landfarm with associated monitoring locations 7 Figure 2 Company provided landfarm application area map Wellington Landfarm 14 Figure 3 Long terms TDS concentrations GND2284, 2285 and drainage pipe GND2364 19 List of photos Photo 1 An example of a landfarmed area Wellington landfarm 2013 6

Officers report on submissions Proposed River Control and Flood Protection Bylaws 2020

responses 1 Clause 6 – Floodways Amend Decline The submitter opposes clause 6.1. The submitter has a number of services located over and under floodways, which do not affect the ability of the floodway to function. In some situations, services are placed on road bridges (e.g. the North Street Bridge crossing the Waitara River - Map 2c) which would require an authority under clause 6.1(d). The submitter seeks the following amendment: 6.1 No person, except Network Utility