...........................................................................................................6
8.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................6
FIGURES
Figure 1. A map of the seismographs used to locate earthquakes in Taranaki. ................................................8
Figure 2. A map of all earthquakes located in Taranaki between July 2009 and June 2010.............................9
Figure 3. A map of earthquakes less than 50 km deep located in Taranaki between July 2009 and
June 2010.
........................................................................................................... 6
FIGURES
Figure 1. A map of the seismographs used to locate earthquakes in Taranaki. ................................................ 8
Figure 2. A map of all earthquakes located in Taranaki between July 2010 and June 2011. ............................ 9
Figure 3. A map of earthquakes less than 50 km deep located in Taranaki between July 2010 and
June 2011.
........................................................................................................... 6
FIGURES
Figure 1. A map of the seismographs used to locate earthquakes in Taranaki. ................................................ 8
Figure 2. A map of all earthquakes located in Taranaki between July 2011 and June 2012. ............................ 9
Figure 3. A map of earthquakes less than 50 km deep located in Taranaki between July 2011 and
June 2012..
up as remnants were tracking towards the drain. By 27 June the
waste bins with paint boxes had been cleaned up promptly, but the powder coating area was still generally
messy with rubbish and it was advised to keep on top of housekeeping in this area.
2.1.2 Results of discharge and receiving water monitoring
Sampling locations are described in Table 2 and indicated on the map in Figure 2.
Table 2 Locations and details of sampling sites
Site Location GPS coordinates Site code
scientists and data
analysts are studying climate issues in greater detail and
our policymakers are considering the impacts of a future
climate on the environment, including water availability and
ecosystem health.
We are working in partnership with local district councils,
building our collective understanding of climate change
impacts, risks and opportunities. Along with local councils,
iwi and hapū, and research partners such as Massey
University and GNS Science we
environment monitoring in relation to the Trust’s site 5
Table 4 Summary of performance for consent 1281-4 7
Table 5 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 8
List of figures
Figure 1 Aerial location map of Hickman JD 1997 Family Trust 2
Figure 2 Location of the Hickman JD Family Trust site and associated sampling sites 4
page
1
1 Introduction
Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource
Management Act 1991
1.1.1
1: Structure of Better Travel Choices for Taranaki ........................................................................................................ 5
Figure 2: New Plymouth Citylink urban route map ................................................................................................................. 11
Figure 3: Connector service and timetable
............................................................................ 30
Appendix 3. OBIS (2016) data export. Presented as an excel list. See attached electronic files. ....... 30
Appendix 4. Threatened and/or at-risk species from within, and in the vicinity-of, the TCMA.
Presented as an excel list (Freeman et al. 2010) and GIS mapping package. See
attached electronic files. ................................................................................................... 30
Appendix 5. Possible sensitive environment indicator species EEZ (2012) from
clearly highlights
there was an urgency to activate the process, then quickly
recommended by Colin McLellan on the 7/1/19. Under
Question 3 of the process “Statutory Acknowledgements
“The Iwi impacted on is not acknowledged, Ngaati Mutunga,
this is in breach of Treaty Principles of “Partnership“,
”Protection of Taaonga” and being accorded the appropriate
rights to the Mana Whenua of this area. No level of
contamination is and ever will be acceptable into these
waterways. These awa present
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotationContents MAP 1
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject Typewritten Text
annotation annotationTitle KATHRYN
annotationSubject