were sampled. Both were clean with low volumes as they had been released
earlier in the week. The site was very tidy and well maintained. The draft PSI and new groundwater
management plan were under review, to be finalised shortly. There had been 70 responses to the public
survey so far. A letter drop had been carried out the previous week to over five hundred residential and
commercial properties in the area. A meeting with iwi had been held two days prior to explain the technical
work being
the threshold to
display patterns of lower kinship (cousins, grandparents, etc.).
In KGD we also conducted a principal coordinate analysis (PCA) of kinship for each species,
and mapped the first two principal coordinates and displayed these on maps of Taranaki
using the package ggmaps (Kahle & Wickham 2013) in R. A principal coordinate analysis
(PCA) is a statistical technique that takes multi-dimensional data (such as population
genetic data, which have a high number of markers per
hearing would be requested, otherwise the Hapu’s counsel would submit
a memorandum to the Court requesting that the Hearing Committee’s decision stands.
On 1 August 2007, STDC wrote to iwi and the Council committing to: work on
decreasing storm water ingress to the Hawera sewerage system; testing the
permeability of the detention storage pond; not exceed the 12,000 m3/day volume of
the consent; and undertaking the necessary work under the consent (condition 10) to
review in 2009 the best
the hapu appeal was 30 August 2007. If an agreement was not reached by this date
then it was agreed that a hearing would be requested, otherwise the Hapu’s counsel
would submit a memorandum to the Court requesting that the Hearing Committee’s
decision stands.
On 1 August 2007, STDC wrote to iwi and the Council committing to: work on
decreasing storm water ingress to the Hawera sewerage system; testing the
permeability of the detention storage pond; not exceed the 12,000 m3/day volume
Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) consent monitoring report - Taranaki Regional Council.
review 4
Table 2 Summary of performance for consent 7374-1.5 8
Table 3 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 8
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing the location of the site 3
Figure 2 Aerial image of the Malandra Downs property 3
Figure 3 Malandra Downs site in 2007 6
Figure 4 Aerial image showing the extent of the sand movement across the property (May 2024) 7
page
1
Introduction
Compliance monitoring programme reports and the
page
224
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I Append ices
Appendix 2 – Statutory acknowledgements
The Statutory Acknowledgements for the seven Taranaki iwi that have settled with the Crown will be included here.
legislative frameworks
including, but not restricted to, the Local Government Act 2002, the Resource Management
Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Iwi considerations
21. This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the
Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making
processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as outlined in the adopted long-
term plan and/or annual …
Schedule 4A). However, the table below identifies some coastal ecosystems and areas containing significant
indigenous biodiversity values in accordance with Policy 14 of the Plan. They contribute to what is collectively referred to as "significant indigenous biodiversity areas" within the
Plan and have been mapped where appropriate. They include:
Table 2: Known significant indigenous biodiversity areas found on the Taranaki coast.
Significant indigenous biodiversity areas
found on the
with iwi and hapū continues
• Report out in late 2023 sharing feedback from
this round of engagement
• Next round of workshops:
– Mar/Apr 2024
• Notification of Freshwater Provisions end 2024
page
Working with people | caring for Taranaki
Tell us what you think
• Via one of six location based surveys
(available at www.trc.govt.nz)
• Via a written submission
• Email policy@trc.govt.nz
• Via a meeting with policy staff
Feedback to us no later than