Your search for 'iwi' returned 1105 results.

Annual Report 2013/2014 - full document

non-notified processes through consultation and/or written approvals with dozens of affected parties, including iwi and hapu. The key outcome of the pre-hearing process was that eleven potential hearings were avoided as a result of successful pre-hearing meetings Again the Council policy of holding pre-hearing meetings of submitters to consent applications to reduce the amount of time taken up with expensive and time consuming hearings was successful with all eleven applications

Anne-Maree McKay - Remediation NZ submission

testing monthly site visits from TRC. 6 monthly cultural health monitoring by local iwi with minimum health requirements in consent as agreed on between Ngāti Mutunga, TRC and Remediation (NZ) Ltd. Complete riparian planting across entire site. You can upload a document containing the conditions you seek here NA Attendance and wish to be heard at consent hearing I/we wish to be heard in support of my/our submission No By answering no, you will not be advised of the date of any consent

Council meeting minutes August 2018

Coastal Plan for Taranaki and the Proposed Regional Coastal Plan for Taranaki. PFOS Mr G K Bedford, Director-Environment Quality, provided an update to Members on the Council’s detection of elevated levels of chemicals associated with firefighting foam (PFAS) found in eels in two South Taranaki streams (Oaonui and Ngapirau). Iwi and local residents have been notified. The Council’s investigation into PFOS was undertaken following the discovery (in 2017) of drinking water

Appendix K - landscaping plan

Plan-completed work page Landscaping Plan REMEDIATION NZ LTD Page 9 Document No:RU-650-0700-A Revision No:1.3 Date:7-11-2019 Controller: D Gibson Riparian planting has been completed in the marked areas. Further planting will be undertaken to enhance areas that have already been planted. Preferred Species to be planted Extract from Ngati Mutunga Iwi Environmental Management Plan 3. Require that riparian restoration uses indigenous species that

Long-Term Plan 2015/2025

schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002 requires the Council to set out in its long-term plan any steps that the Council intends to take to foster the development of Maori capacity to contribute to the decision making processes of the Council over the period covered by the Plan. There are eight recognised iwi in the region. To achieve these objectives the Council intends to undertake the following: FOUNDATIONS OF A RELATIONSHIP Act cooperatively and in

Pesticides in surface water in Taranaki 2019

this Council under various legislative frameworks including, but not restricted to, the Local Government Act 2002, the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. Iwi considerations This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as outlined in the adopted long-term

2016 Environmental Awards winners

… corporates to farmers to community groups to iwi and hapū to schools. These awards are an opportunity to celebrate this effort. I'm very pleased to welcome back our category sponsors, whose support allows us to celebrate these awards in fitting style. Regional Council Taranaki Welcome to the 2016 Taranaki Regional Council Environmental Awards. These are the 24th annual awards since the Council first started this programme back in 1993. Tonight we're making 15 awards. But

Appendix 4C: Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi

Ngāti Hine Waiatarua, Ngāti Ruaiti, and Ngāti Maika gathered food according to the values of Ngā Raurutanga and kawa along the coast from Waipipi to Mowhanau and the Kai Iwi stream. Tamareheroto (Ngāti Pukeko and Ngāti Iti) exercised food gathering according to the values of Ngā Raurutanga and kawa along the coast from the Okehu stream to the mouth of the Whanganui River, including from the fishing station of Kaihau a Kupe (at the mouth of the Whanganui River). Ngā Kaainga at Kaihau a Kupe

2320899 Section32AA Evaluation

32AA eva lua t ion Issue/theme Options Section 32AA evaluation Conclusion  No additional costs. Reduced costs on consent applicants as there are less sites of significance identified and there is no policy requirement to protect species specifically of value to Māori. Option 2: To include:  A new Policy 14B to provide policy direction to protect taonga species identified through iwi deeds of settlement and scheduled in the Plan (Schedule 4C).  New permitted and