the hapu appeal was 30 August 2007. If an agreement was not reached by this date
then it was agreed that a hearing would be requested, otherwise the Hapu’s counsel
would submit a memorandum to the Court requesting that the Hearing Committee’s
decision stands.
On 1 August 2007, STDC wrote to iwi and the Council committing to: work on
decreasing storm water ingress to the Hawera sewerage system; testing the
permeability of the detention storage pond; not exceed the 12,000 m3/day volume
10. Resource Consents Issued Under Delegated Authority and Applications in Progress
10.1 Mr A D McLay, Director – Resource Management, spoke to the memorandum
updating Members of consents granted, consents under application and consent
processing actions, since the last meeting. The information was summarised in the
attachments. The reports provided more information on consultation undertaken with
iwi and the community.
Recommended
That the Taranaki Regional Council: …
page
224
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I Append ices
Appendix 2 – Statutory acknowledgements
The Statutory Acknowledgements for the seven Taranaki iwi that have settled with the Crown will be included here.
positions adopted by this Council under various legislative frameworks
including, but not restricted to, the Local Government Act 2002, the Resource Management
Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Iwi considerations
13. This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the
Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making
processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as
legislative frameworks
including, but not restricted to, the Local Government Act 2002, the Resource Management
Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Iwi considerations
21. This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the
Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making
processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as outlined in the adopted long-
term plan and/or annual …
option of obtaining their written approval so that your application can be non-notified.
Are there any parties that may potentially be affected by this
proposal?
Yes
Name of affected party Mangorei Forum Collaboration Agreement
Contact details NA
Please outline any consultation you have undertaken with this
party and the outcome.
This forum consists of the following iwi and hapu: Te
Kotahitanga o Te Atiawa Trust; Manukorihi hapū; Nga Mahanga
a Tairi; Ngati Rahiri
Thursday 23 July, 10.30am: Policy and
Planning Committee.
Monday 3 August, 10am: Executive
Committee.
Tuesday 11 August, 10.30am: Ordinary
Council meeting.
Thursday 27 August, 10.30am: Solid Waste
Management Committee.
For meeting dates:
www.trc.govt.nz/meetings-calendar/
For agendas and minutes:
www.trc.govt.nz/agendas-and-minutes/
Flagship awards gain
an extra dimension
Taranaki’s flagship Environmental Awards are
back for 2015, with regional iwi adding
motor vehicle are generally slightly higher among iwi.
Add the following to the paragraph on Iwi in Section 2.2 (on page 6)
Generally, higher proportions of iwi in the region are transport disadvantaged due to both
a lower level of access to private motor vehicles and a greater proportion of the Maori
population being under the age of 15.
Add a further measure of ‘Ongoing consideration of possible heavy vehicle bypass
routes of residential/commercial areas where appropriate’ to
recreation, and water supply purposes, and maintains or enhances
aquatic ecosystems."
(Emphasis)
b. Ng ti Mutunga Iwi Management Plan
Refer the evidence of Anne-Maree McKay.
13
page
49. There must be a fair appraisal of the relevant objectives and policies of these
planning documents.46
50. Even if recourse is to be had to Part 2 of the Act, this can't be done in a way
that would subvert these important policies.
51. Under Part 2, you must recognise and provide
understand the problems encountered locally, and enabled concerns or opportunities of a walkway extension
to be raised. Stakeholders were identified as those who would be affected by a walkway extension. At the
first workshop it became apparent that Iwi and Hapu stakeholders held concerns that investment in a
walkway extension may result in negative cultural outcomes. The first workshop became an opportunity to
discuss the history of the investment proposal, the concerns stakeholders had,