scientists and data analysts are studying climate issues in greater detail and our policymakers are considering the impacts of a future climate on the environment, including water availability and ecosystem health. We are working in partnership with local district councils, building our collective understanding of climate change impacts, risks and opportunities. Along with local councils, iwi and hapū, and research partners such as Massey University and GNS Science we
clearly highlights there was an urgency to activate the process, then quickly recommended by Colin McLellan on the 7/1/19. Under Question 3 of the process “Statutory Acknowledgements “The Iwi impacted on is not acknowledged, Ngaati Mutunga, this is in breach of Treaty Principles of “Partnership“, ”Protection of Taaonga” and being accorded the appropriate rights to the Mana Whenua of this area. No level of contamination is and ever will be acceptable into these waterways. These awa present
water 75 6.4.3 Chapter 7: Air and climate change 77 6.4.4 Chapter 10.3 Maintaining and enhancing amenity values 77 6.4.5 Chapter 12: Waste management 77 6.4.6 Chapter 15.2 Providing for regionally significant infrastructure 78 6.4.7 Chapter 16 Statement of resource management issues of significance to iwi authorities 79 Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki 80 6.5.1 Chapter 3 Natural, ecological and amenity values and public access 80 6.5.2 Chapter 4 Tangata Whenua
the Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/22-2026/27 6 page Management Act 2003, the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. Iwi considerations 15. This memorandum and the associated recommendations are consistent with the Council’s policy for the development of Māori capacity to contribute to decision-making processes (schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002) as outlined in the adopted long- term plan and/or
Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting May 2017.
at 14 November 2016. Joyce/Williamson 7. Freshwater Monitoring by Iwi 7.1 Ms K Blakemore, Technical Officer, spoke to the memorandum informing the Committee of freshwater monitoring by Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi iwi and hapu of streams and rivers within their rohe that is occurring within Taranaki with the involvement of the Council. Recommended That the Taranaki Regional Council: 1. receives this report Freshwater monitoring by Iwi Policy and Planning Committee
a memorandum to the Court requesting that the Hearing Committee’s decision stands. On 1 August 2007, STDC wrote to iwi and the Council committing to: work on decreasing storm water ingress to the Hawera sewerage system; testing the permeability of the detention storage pond; not exceed the 12,000 m3/day volume of the consent; and undertaking the necessary work under the consent (condition 10) to review in 2009 the best practicable option for treatment and disposal of wastewater,
additional accelerated funding for a bypass of Mount Messenger on State Highway 3 (SH3). The new project needs to be included within the Taranaki RLTPlan in order to be progressed. The Transport Agency has therefore lodged a request to vary the current RLTPlan. 4.3 The Committee noted and encouraged the NZ Transport Agency to engage early with affected communities, including Iwi (Ngāti Tama) and landowners re the new Mount Messenger Bypass roading project to avoid any
� Information Sheet-Wetlands � The Importance of Riparian Management Related Links –Taranaki � Taranaki Regional Xplorer � Taranaki Iwi Contacts � East Taranaki Environmental Trust � Egmont National Park (Department of Conservation) � Fish and Game-Taranaki Region � New Plymouth District Council - Sustainable District � Rotokare Scenic Reserve Trust � Taranaki Kiwi Trust � Taranaki tree Trust page General Information on Biodiversity available on the
processing the application. The final cost (less the deposit) is invoiced at the end of the application process. In accordance with statutory requirements a copy of this application may be sent to iwi for their information. Withdrawn applications will incur the cost for work done up to the date of withdrawal. Applications returned due to inadequate information will incur the cost of work done in receiving the application, assessing the information and returning the application.