being over
300 metres away, there was no biomonitoring surveys of receiving waters. Eleven ground
water bores/wells were regularly sampled over a 12 month period, to monitor for discharges
to groundwater at the site (particularly around the flare/blowdown pit), and for any effects on
shallow groundwater aquifers either from fracturing activities or spillages. An investigation of
air quality arising from flaring of fracturing fluids was carried out. This work has been
repeated separately.
AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to ISO9001, ISO14001 AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001.
© AECOM New Zealand Limited (AECOM). All rights reserved.
AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other
party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any
third party who may rely upon or use this
returning to the wellhead post-fracturing, were
also obtained for physicochemical analysis in order to characterise the discharges and to determine
compliance with consent conditions.
The monitoring carried out by the Council indicates that the hydraulic fracturing activities undertaken by
Todd had no significant adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water resources. There were no
unauthorised incidents recording non-compliance in respect of the resource consents held by Todd in
POLICY STATEMENT OR PLANS AND THE
PROCESSING OF RESOURCE CONSENTS
Request for preparation or change to a
plan/policy statement $50,000
For non-notified farm dairy discharge consent $695
For non-notified consent other $1,040
For notified consents (limited and public) $7,000
Renewal, change or review of consent:
Non-notified $1,040
Notified (limited and public) $7,000
Extension of a consent lapse date $450
Certificate of compliance $1,040
Approvals under
data.
Section 3 discusses the results, their interpretation, and their significance for the
environment.
Section 4 presents recommendations to be implemented in the 2015-2016 monitoring
year.
A glossary of common abbreviations and scientific terms, and a bibliography, are
presented at the end of the report.
1.1.3 The Resource Management Act (1991) and monitoring
The RMA primarily addresses environmental ‘effects’ which are defined as positive
or adverse, temporary or
acceptable level. The
recommended improvements or upgrade are listed as follows:
1. Installation of flashing lights and bells on all approaches to the level crossing.
2. Reshaping the cut face to improve visibility of any approaching train (we expect this is unlikely
to occur as may need private land to achieve).
3. Lifting up the road approach to the level crossing to improve visibility of the approaching trains
and remove the hump at the level crossing, which could lead to grounding out.
(Notes Subscription Agreement)
Amendment and Restatement Deed (Guarantee and Indemnity)
d) authorises the Chief Executive to execute the Chief Executive Certificate and such
other documents and take such other steps on behalf of Council as the Chief
Executive considers it necessary or desirable to execute or take to give effect to
recommendation b) above.
Davey/McIntyre
10. Public Transport Operational Update for the Quarter Ending 31 March 2020
10.1 Mr M J Nield, …
resource consents.
The LTCCP identifies the following targets for consent processing and administration:
• Provide appropriate and timely information in response to 100% of requests for assistance
in undertaking or complying with the consents process under the Resource Management
Act 1991.
• Process, issue and report upon 100% of
accepted resource consent applications in
compliance with the Resource
Management Act 1991 and the Council’s
Resource Consents Procedures document
(TRC
review, and the results and
environmental effects of the consent holder’s activities.
Colin Boyd holds three resource consents, and Surrey Road Landfarms Limited (a subsidiary
company in relation to the landfarming operations at this site) holds one. Two of these
consents permit the discharge of drilling waste onto and into land via landfarming or
landspreading (7559-1 & 7591-1). One consent permits the temporary stockpiling of material
prior to landfarming (6900-2) and one consent permits the
defined
in Part 2 of the RMA. The application as it stands fails to ensure that adverse effects of the
activities are avoided, remedied or mitigated. In particular it is inconsistent with;
• Matters of national importance outlined in s 6(a) of the RMA
• Other matters outlined in s 7 of the RMA, including: 7(d), 7(f) and 7(g) of the RMA;
13. The application is contrary to the objectives and policies of the NPS-FM, including:
• Objective A1(a) To safeguard the life