Management Act 1991 and monitoring
The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) primarily addresses environmental
‘effects’ which are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or permanent, past,
present or future, or cumulative. Effects may arise in relation to:
(a) the neighbourhood or the wider community around a discharger, and may
include cultural and socio-economic effects;
(b) physical effects on the locality, including landscape, amenity and visual effects;
(c) ecosystems, including
report.
1.1.3 The Resource Management Act 1991 and monitoring
The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) primarily addresses environmental ‘effects’
which are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or permanent, past, present or
future, or cumulative. Effects may arise in relation to:
(a) the neighbourhood or the wider community around a discharger, and may
include cultural and social-economic effects;
page
2
(b) physical effects on the locality, including
activities
undertaken by GPL had no adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water resources.
There were no unauthorised incidents recording non-compliance in respect of the resource
consents, or provisions in regional plans, during the period under review.
GPL demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance and
compliance with the resource consent over the reporting period.
page
For reference, in the 2012-2013 year, 35% of consent holders
programme on
unnamed tributaries of the Manganui River. Samples of hydraulic fracturing fluids, and fluids
returning to the wellhead post-fracturing, were also obtained for physicochemical analysis in
order to characterise the discharges and to determine compliance with consent conditions.
The monitoring carried out by the Council indicates that the hydraulic fracturing activities
undertaken by Todd had no significant adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water
resources. There were
results, their interpretation, and their significance for the
environment.
Section 4 presents recommendations to be implemented in the 2014-2015 monitoring
year.
A glossary of common abbreviations and scientific terms, and a bibliography, are
presented at the end of the report.
page
2
1.1.3 The Resource Management Act (1991) and monitoring
The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) primarily addresses environmental
`effects' which are defined as positive or
ARSENIC
01
Swim-through dip
So
ur
ce
: E
nv
iro
nm
en
t W
ai
ka
to
So
ur
ce
: T
as
m
an
D
is
tr
ic
t C
ou
nc
il
waterways or drains. Arsenic concentrations in surface and
groundwater can exceed the New Zealand Drinking Water
Standard for arsenic of 0.01 mg L[1] and the guideline for stock
drinking water is 0.5 mg L[2]. Concentrations of arsenic high
enough to be fatal to humans and stock have been measured
in groundwater contaminated by former
Council indicates that the hydraulic fracturing activities
undertaken by Todd had no adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water resources.
There were no unauthorised incidents recording non-compliance in respect of the resource
consent, or provisions in regional plans, during the period under review.
Todd demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance and
compliance with the resource consent over the reporting period.
page
For
had no significant adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water resources. There were no
unauthorised incidents recording non-compliance in respect of the resource consent held by GPL in relation
to these activities or provisions in regional plans, during the period under review.
GPL demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance and compliance with the
resource consents over the reporting period.
For reference, in the 2017-2018 year, consent holders
surveys, four pond effluent and 36 downstream water samples collected for physicochemical analysis,
and two biomonitoring surveys of receiving waters.
The monitoring showed that activities at the Eltham WWTP were well managed. There were no issues with
operation of the plant or odour associated with plant processes. The level of the primary pond was well
managed by the diversion pumping system to Hawera, and the holding pond was not required to be used
as short-term storage. As a result of
decisions should they be stuck at
home, can’t get home, have to evacuate or
have no power, water, phone or internet.
What about fire drills in schools?
A fire drill is a method of practising how a
school should be evacuated in the event of a
fire. Usually, the school's existing fire alarm
system is activated and the school is
evacuated as if the emergency is occurring.
Students and teachers should practise getting
out of, and away from the school buildings as