executive must give the persons elected to the local authority not less
than 7 days' notice of the meeting.
(3) Despite subclause (2), if an emergency exists, the chief executive may give
notice of the meeting as soon as practicable.
(4) The chief executive (or, in the absence of the chief executive, a nominee of that
officer) must chair the meeting until the mayor or chairperson has made and
attested the declaration required under clause 14
(5) The business that must be conducted at the
are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or
permanent, past, present or future, or cumulative. Effects may arise in relation to:
a. the neighbourhood or the wider community around an activity, and may include cultural and social-
economic effects;
b. physical effects on the locality, including landscape, amenity and visual effects;
c. ecosystems, including effects on plants, animals, or habitats, whether aquatic or terrestrial;
page
2
d. natural and physical
page
Coastal Management Area D : Port Taranaki
page
2
2
Structures
Activity Rule Standards/Terms/Conditions Classification Notification Control/Discretion Policy References
Alteration, reconstruction or
removal and replacement of
an existing structure for
maintenance or alteration to
the upper surfaces of
existing wharves and
breakwaters for purposes
directly relating to port
company operations
D1.1 • Activity is for the
Risk Committee however the committee felt that it was best for this item to be
deferred to the Policy and Planning Committee.
5. Meeting Dates for August and September
The dates for the next six weekly round of meetings for August and September were
circulated for information.
6. Electoral Decisions
6.1 Mr M J Nield, Acting Chief Executive, spoke to the memorandum for Council to
consider whether to continue to use First Past the Post (FPP) or Single Transferable
Vote …
approved by Maritime New Zealand is termed an
NZOSCA. The other benefit of using the term OSCA is that it extends to other product types that may
be used beyond ‘dispersants’.
As the definition of an oil spill in Part 132 reads “…an actual or probable release, discharge, or escape
of oil”, a natural oil seep resulting from dredging activities is already regulated by Part 132 and the
MTA. Do you therefore need Rule 4? If so, all relevant sections of Part 132 would apply including
provisions
Until May 2014, the site was known as Riverlands Eltham. The plant has an
associated wastewater treatment system from which treated effluent is disposed of either to land or to the
river. This report covers the Company’s processing season from October 2018 to September 2019 and
describes the monitoring programme implemented by the Taranaki Regional Council (the Council) to assess
the Company’s environmental performance during the period under review. The report also details the
results of the
submitters by
Plan provision. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to Plan provisions
relate to the publicly notified version of the Proposed Coastal Plan for Taranaki.
Further submissions may only be made in support of or opposition to the submissions
already made. A further submission cannot extend the scope of the original submission
and can only seek allowance or disallowance (in whole or in part) of the original
submission.
The deadline for further
activities have been directly associated with drilling, such as
disturbance of the seabed by drilling or discharges of drilling muds, cuttings and drilling
fluids, these are largely Permitted Activities, subject to meeting standards, terms and
conditions to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. Other
associated activities such as the temporary exclusive occupation of the Coastal Marine
Area (CMA) for the purpose of drilling and the depositing of drilling muds,
demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance.
George Family, Bishop, and Graham Harris demonstrated an overall good level of
environmental performance.
The Council's monitoring programme included 33 inspections, with each site receiving either
two or three scheduled inspections. Council also took 13 water samples for physicochemical
analysis during the 2015-2016 year.
No adverse environmental effects were observed as a result of any of the consent holders’
activities at the
Coastal Protection
Area: is the extent of the district’s coastal environment and means land within the district seaward of a line identified as
the inland boundary of the Coastal Protection Area on the District Plan Maps.
page
3
Forest & Bird submission on proposed Taranaki Coastal Plan
10. Relief sought:
1) Amend Policy 2 to:
a. Give effect to Policy 4 of the NZCPS, including by providing for coordinated
management or control of activities in the coastal environment;