Commissioners Philip Milne [Chairperson] John Iseli S J Ruru 04 February 2022 Chief Executive Doc #2977464 page Order of Proceedings for a hearing of an application lodged by Airport Farm Trustee for the following consent: Consents 5262-3.0: to discharge emissions into the air from a free range poultry farming operation and submissions; to be heard by the Hearing Committee appointed by the Taranaki Regional Council; to be held at The
from the irrigation areas were 3563 kg N/yr, or 992 kg N/ha/yr. (Based on 2019 irrigation areas). 2.2 Project Scope The scope of this report is confined to; • The areas on the Uruti site which include the Irrigation pond and the two irrigation areas, and; • The compost located on Pads 1 & 3 which is suitable to be spread onto the irrigations areas as a soil conditioner and fertiliser. The report is prepared on the basis that drilling mud deliveries cease on 31 December 2020. The
addresses environmental ‘effects’ which are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or permanent, past, present or future, or cumulative. Effects may arise in relation to: a. the neighbourhood or the wider community around an activity, and may include cultural and social- economic effects; b. physical effects on the locality, including landscape, amenity and visual effects; c. ecosystems, including effects on plants, animals, or habitats, whether aquatic or terrestrial; d. natural and
Section 3 discusses the results, their interpretations, and their significance for the environment. Section 4 presents recommendations to be implemented in the 2019-2020 monitoring year. A glossary of common abbreviations and scientific terms, and a bibliography, are presented at the end of the report. 1.1.3 The Resource Management Act 1991 and monitoring The RMA primarily addresses environmental ‘effects’ which are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or permanent, past, present
provided R2/10835-1.0 Commencement Date: 22 Jul 2020 Summerset Villages (Bell Block) Limited Expiry Date: PO Box 5187, Wellington 6140 Review Dates: Jun 2026 and 6-yearly thereafter Activity Class: Discretionary Location: 56 Pohutukawa Place, Bell Block Application Purpose: New To drill and construct a bore Rohe: Te Atiawa (Statutory Acknowledgement) Engagement or consultation: Te Kotahitanga o Te Atiawa Trust Comment on …
approved by Maritime New Zealand is termed an NZOSCA. The other benefit of using the term OSCA is that it extends to other product types that may be used beyond ‘dispersants’. As the definition of an oil spill in Part 132 reads “…an actual or probable release, discharge, or escape of oil”, a natural oil seep resulting from dredging activities is already regulated by Part 132 and the MTA. Do you therefore need Rule 4? If so, all relevant sections of Part 132 would apply including provisions
submitters by Plan provision. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to Plan provisions relate to the publicly notified version of the Proposed Coastal Plan for Taranaki. Further submissions may only be made in support of or opposition to the submissions already made. A further submission cannot extend the scope of the original submission and can only seek allowance or disallowance (in whole or in part) of the original submission. The deadline for further
activities have been directly associated with drilling, such as disturbance of the seabed by drilling or discharges of drilling muds, cuttings and drilling fluids, these are largely Permitted Activities, subject to meeting standards, terms and conditions to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. Other associated activities such as the temporary exclusive occupation of the Coastal Marine Area (CMA) for the purpose of drilling and the depositing of drilling muds,
or simon@traverse.co.nz Location: Kohiti Road, Okaiawa Consent No: 2049-5.0 Application lodged: To discharge treated wastewater from a rendering operation and from a farm dairy into the Inaha Stream Consent No: 2050-5.0 Application lodged: To discharge cooling water and backwash water from a rendering operation into an unnamed tributary of the Inaha Stream Consent No: 2051-5.0 Application lodged: To take water from the Inaha Stream for a rendering operation
demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance. George Family, Bishop, and Graham Harris demonstrated an overall good level of environmental performance. The Council's monitoring programme included 33 inspections, with each site receiving either two or three scheduled inspections. Council also took 13 water samples for physicochemical analysis during the 2015-2016 year. No adverse environmental effects were observed as a result of any of the consent holders’ activities at the