Management Plan
SPR Special Purpose Road
STDC South Taranaki District Council
STE Stock Truck Effluent
TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate
TIO Transport Investment Online
TP Transport Programme
TRC Taranaki Regional Council
TSIG Transport Special Interest Group
VKT Vehicle Kilometres Travelled
Regional Transport Committee - Confirmation of RTAG Minutes - October and November 2023
15
page
@BCL@401CED03
Taranaki Regional
3 and 5 of the attached
Assessment of Environmental Effects.
page
Liquids discharged to water
What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge?
Rate 2000.0
Unit Litres per second
How frequent is the discharge? Not constant
Hours per day 0.00
Days per week 0.00
Other
Give full details of the method of discharge: The discharge will occur on an as required basis when flows in the
Motukawa Race are high. Further details of the
"Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant
page number in the text box.
Give full details of the source of the discharge and any
treatment it will receive prior to discharge:
These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached
Assessment of Environmental Effects.
Liquids discharged to water
What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge?
Rate 7787.0
Unit Litres per second
How
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The
by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement
Risk Cause and Effect Mitigation Strategy
Risk Rating
(unmitigated)
Comments
(including current actions)
Challenges in
conducting effective
engagement with
tangata whenua as
required under the
NPS-FM.
Challenges in tangata whenua
resourcing and the timelines
that the TRC is required to
meet may place pressure on
the ability of staff to engage
fully with iwi and hapū.
Additionally, this pressure can
lead to a misalignment
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to
achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each companies environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high,