Coastal and Marine Environment

The Taranaki region has a long coastline with rocky shores and cliffs, sandy beaches, subtidal reefs, river mouths and estuaries.

Opunake Beach. Taranaki people value the landscape, natural character and amenity recreational values of the coast. It is particularly significant for local iwi and hapu as kaitiaki or guardians of the coast.

The generally excellent coastal water quality found in Taranaki is the combined result of a low and declining number of point source discharges to the coastal marine area, improvements in waste treatment and disposal options and an exposed coastline with currents and high-energy waves.

Download this section of the full report 293kb

Top of page

Coastal Water Quality

click for large versions.


The Taranaki Regional Council monitors marine ecology, beach bathing water quality and compliance with resource consent conditions. In summary:

  • Taranaki’s coastal water quality for swimming is excellent, with most popular bathing beaches complying with national bathing standards.
  • Rocky shore ecological health is reasonably stable at most sites monitored. Sand inundation reduces rocky shore species diversity, but this returns to normal once the sand moves on.
  • 43 consents are held for discharges to the coast, but there are now only six major community or industrial treated wastewater discharges direct to coastal waters, compared to some 25 major discharges 30 years ago.
  • Compliance monitoring shows that significant improvements continue to be made in terms of waste treatment and disposal systems.
  • The main influence on coastal water quality now is rivers and streams discharging to the sea, carrying with them the cumulative effects of land uses within their catchments. This is most noticeable from catchments draining the more erodible hillcountry rivers.

Download this section of the full report 1mb

Top of page

Natural Character
The rugged nature of the Taranaki coastal environment means much of the coastal area has retained its distinct natural character. In relation to natural character:

  • Since the Regional Coastal Plan became operative, 238 coastal consents have been granted, reviewed or varied for activities in the coastal marine area; 96 new coastal consents have been granted since 2003.
  • Most coastal permits are for coastal protection works and stormwater structures, followed by foreshore disturbance and discharges.
  • An estimated 11.6 km of seawall have been built to protect the region from coastal erosion; about 2 km of this have been constructed over the past five years.
  • Activities authorised by resource consents generally have negligible effects on the natural character of the coast.
  • Foredune restoration works and sand dumping trials have been conducted to restore natural character to parts of the coast.

The Council’s Regional Coastal Plan contains policies and methods to protect the natural character of the coastal marine area, and district plans contain policies and methods to protect the natural character of the landward section of the coastal environment.

Download this section of the full report 427kb

Top of page

Biodiversity
The steep cliffs, rocky shores, sandy beaches, subtidal reefs, river mouths and estuaries along the Taranaki coast provide a wide range of ecological habitats for native plant and animal species.

Since the last state of the environment report, 3,248 ha have been fully protected in two marine reserves.

Monitoring of coastal and marine biodiversity is undertaken by Taranaki Regional Council (estuaries and rocky shore communities), the Department of Conservation (marine protected areas and threatened marine mammals), the Ministry of Fisheries (fish stocks) and the Ornithological Society (birds).

Moke and marine sponges. In summary:

  • Ecological conditions in both the Tongaporutu and Waitotara estuaries are generally stable although they can be affected by severe floods.
  • More than 70 different bird species use the monitored estuaries.
  • The legally protected subtidal habitats around the Sugar Loaf Islands (Nga Motu) provide shelter for a greater diversity and higher numbers of fish and other organisms than neighbouring areas of reef.
  • Extensive reef ledges in North Taranaki support a highly diverse collection of rare and exotic sponges now protected from human activities by a marine reserve.
  • There are disparate views on trends in local fish stocks, and quality of recreational fishing.
  • Threatened marine animals are observed in Taranaki waters, including great white sharks, orcas, humpback whales, southern right whales, and Maui’s dolphins.
  • Reclusive beaked whales have been washed up on Taranaki beaches, enabling scientists to study them.

Download this section of the full report 980kb

Top of page

Public Access
Generally, the public has very good access to most parts of the coast in Taranaki. A recent inventory of sites of local or regional significance found that:

  • 58% had excellent to good public access.
  • Some sites are physically difficult to access due to high tides or eroding cliffs.
  • Public roads provide the greatest degree of public access to the coast.
  • Subdivision offers opportunity for public access to be increased through the provision of esplanade reserves or strips.
  • The biggest constraint to public access is lack of signs or formed roads, and the difficulty of distinguishing between public and private access.

Public access to the coast is primarily protected through district plans. A Regional Walkways and Cycleways Strategy has been developed to promote walking and cycling opportunities, including access to the coast, which are best illustrated by the success of the award-winning New Plymouth coastal walkway.

Download this section of the full report 330kb

Top of page

 

Case study

Oil spill cleanup on the Okato coast.

Coast Wild but also Vulnerable
The harshest of environments can also be vulnerable – as was dramatically illustrated when large amounts of crude oil washed up on the wild and windswept west coast near Okato in October 2007.

It was the largest ever crude oil spill in New Zealand and the second largest oil spill in New Zealand in recent history.

Residents, iwi and the surfing community were alarmed as nearly 15 km of sand and rocks along the coast were fouled by the waxy oil, mostly in the form of small tarballs that melted in the sun.

Taranaki Regional Council staff began planning the clean-up operations under the Marine Oil Spill Response Plan within two hours of the oil being reported. They were later joined by a team from Australian Worldwide Exploration (AWE), which admitted responsibility for a 23- tonne spill from processing equipment associated with the Tui oilfield it operates 60 km offshore.

While the spill was an unwelcome reminder of the coastline’s environmental vulnerability, quick action and fortunate timing kept long-term effects to a minimum.

The oil came ashore on a spring tide, which meant most was deposited at the highest point possible on the beach – well away from the zone where marine life is active. The waxy blobs were quickly scooped off beach surfaces so the fast-melting oil did not have a chance to penetrate deep into the sand.

If it had, a far more extensive and expensive clean-up operation would have been needed. The oil in the rocks was left to weather and break down, as any clean-up action would have caused more environmental damage.

Beaches were monitored after every spring tide and oil that had dissipated from the rocks was cleaned up. Sea water, sediment and kaimoana samples tested by Council staff and by the Cawthron Institute, the latter under contract to AWE, showed no significant increase in hydrocarbon or metal levels.

A feature of the response to this incident was the close liaison between the Council, other agencies, local residents, iwi and surfers, with all consulted as the monitoring programme was developed.

Coastal landowners were also very co-operative, despite it being a busy time of year for farmers. Council staff were given free access over their properties, and the farmers also made equipment available for the clean-up operation.

Maritime New Zealand has taken legal action over the spill. Both AWE and Prosafe (the operators of the floating offshore production station) have appeared in court and entered guilty pleas. The decision on sentencing was yet to come at the time of printing.

Download this section of the full report 1mb

>Top of page